The Scoop: Bots may have been used to sway anti-DE&I public opinion at John Deere, others
Plus: Jobs report likely means good things for U.S. economy; SearchGPT not yet Google killer.
An analysis by a public relations and marketing firm suggests that much of the social engagement surrounding the anti-DE&I policy campaign by conservative activist Robby Starbuck may have been led by bots.
Starbuck led a series of social media attacks earlier this year to challenge the diversity, equity and inclusion policies at companies such as Tractor Supply, John Deere and Harley-Davidson. Each of those companies decided to cancel or scale down DE&I efforts after social media backlash and a general rise in media attention.
However, the firm Jackson Spalding that “much of the volume has been generated by social media bots,” according to Axios.
That’s not to say that all – or even most – of those likes, comments and shares came from bots. But instead, their use likely helped fuel the spread of the information.
The major driver of bot activity is re-posts or likes rather than original posts, according to Justin Williams, a leader of digital and analytics practice at Jackson Spalding.
“If your first assumption is that tens of thousands of people know about this issue and have paid attention to it, then you would expect that when news comes out (about the policy change), it would actually cool things off — but the reverse occurred,” he told Axios.
Starbuck’s protests have also gained traction over time, with recent campaigns against Tractor Supply Company, John Deere and Harley Davidson seeing a 77% increase in media mentions and 40% more social media interactions than previous pushes.
Why it matters: Bots and spammers are a reality, and unfortunately, it doesn’t look like they’re going anywhere. In fact, the Department of Justice reported earlier this week that it had seized 32 internet domains linked to Russian government-led influence campaigns. These properties aimed to spread propaganda and diminish support for Ukraine, promote pro-Russian policies and sway voters in the upcoming U.S. election, per the DOJ.
Axios reported that the rising popularity and access to generative AI will likely lead to an increase in bot activity, and tracking and understanding the social data is becoming more difficult.
For those reasons, it’s important that social media teams really drill into the analytics and measurement tools that matter most to them so they can best understand the effectiveness of messaging on their desired audience.
Vanity metrics like impressions, shares and likes/favorites are nice and easy to quantify. But it’s important to ask what those numbers actually mean to the brand or company. Are these numbers correlating to sales or meaningful engagements? If not, they likely don’t matter all that much.
Remember: The whole point of collecting and analyzing data is to make the communications team more effective.
No business wants to endure a Starbuck-style attack. But if you can understand the data – and more importantly, your customer – it’ll make it easier to weather those social media storms.
Editor’s Top Reads:
- The United States added 142,000 jobs in August and the unemployment rate fell to 4.2%, the Labor Department said Friday. Unfortunately, the numbers weren’t as glowing as economists predicted ahead of expected interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve in less than two weeks. Experts noted that the size of the cut – a normal quarter-point reduction or a larger half-point move – could depend on the outlook presented by this jobs report, according to the New York Times. The strength of the market matters a lot to how our companies and brands will perform. Having a general understanding of the economy is going to strengthen the development of messaging, communications strategy and it will help inform the comms team about what leadership is thinking about. Knowing what your operations team is going through is always a PR best practice.
- An early review of OpenAI’s new SearchGPT indicates the new tool isn’t ready to challenge Google for search engine supremacy just yet. SearchGPT promises to answer user queries using robust summaries with clearly marked sources. While SearchGPT is still in the testing stage, many of the platform’s 10,000 early users say it has struggled to live up to the hype. The Washington Post noted that the platform can produce quality results but what it populates isn’t always consistent and results can be confusing. In some cases, it offered hallucinations. Given the transformative impact of ChatGPT, many people were expecting SearchGPT to be a game-changer out of the box. But these early results are a reminder that this technology is still rapidly evolving and no search tool has totally figured this new tech out – remember when Google’s own AI-powered search tools told users to eat glue? Still, the addition of SearchGPT and other search challengers such as Perplexity are pushing Google to up its game.
- Following considerable layoffs two years ago, X seeks to hire new employees to moderate content and secure the social media platform. The company has posted two dozen job listings over the past month for positions on its safety and cybersecurity teams, according to TechCrunch. The hiring moves seem to be an effort for X to lure back nervous brands after laying off 80% of its trust and safety staff since Elon Musk took over the company in 2022. Over the years, the platform has become overrun by bots. On Thursday, CNN reported that a net 26% of marketers plan to cut advertising spending on X next year because of “concerns that extreme content on the platform could damage their brands.” The survey, conducted by market research firm Kantar, found that only 4% of marketers believe X ads provide “brand safety” — certainty that their ads won’t appear alongside extreme content — compared with 39% for Google ads. Brazil’s Supreme Court effectively banned X in the country last week after failing to remove accounts spreading misinformation. While the new hires are a relative drop in the bucket compared to the thousands of employees previously laid off, anything X can do to show it’s taking misinformation and security seriously is a good thing for the company’s brand and users alike.
Casey Weldon is a reporter for PR Daily. Follow him on LinkedIn.